Find Me Funders
Pledging collateral or paying the unsecured price for the same amount
Collateral does not change whether you can pay. It changes what the lender recovers if you do not — and what you can do with that asset for the next five years.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
Collateral changes nothing about your ability to repay. It changes what the lender collects if you fail. So the price gap between a secured and an unsecured facility for the same amount is, roughly, the lender's expected shortfall in the failure case — and what you are being asked to pay for is the removal of that shortfall.
Which means the decision is not "do I want a lower rate". It is whether the asset you would pledge is worth more to you free than the interest is worth to you saved. That depends on one thing most owners never price: what you intend to do with that asset, and with your borrowing capacity, before the facility is repaid.
Where pledging wins
- Secured at 8.5%: $3,077.48 a month, $34,649 of total interest.
- Unsecured at 15.5%: $3,607.98 a month, $66,479 of total interest.
The gap is $31,830 over the term, $530.50 a month. If the asset you are pledging is a building you will hold for twenty years, or machinery that is already fully paid for and is never leaving the floor, you are being offered $31,830 to file a piece of paper against something you were not going to use anyway. Take it.
The same logic applies when the alternative to pledging is not a higher rate but a smaller loan. An unsecured lender often solves the risk by shrinking the facility rather than pricing it. If unsecured gets you $60,000 and secured gets you the $150,000 you actually need, the comparison is not about rates at all.
Where paying the unsecured price wins
Over those eighteen months, the secured facility saves you $14,478 of interest against the unsecured one.
Now the equipment purchase arrives. The secured facility came with a blanket lien — a UCC-1 over all assets, now owned and later acquired. An equipment funder asked to take a purchase-money position finds a prior blanket filing and asks for a subordination the first lender will not give. So the purchase-money route closes.
- What you wanted: $200,000 of equipment on a purchase-money loan, 48 months at 9.5%. Cost: $41,182.
- What you can actually get with a blanket filing in place: an advance against future sales. $200,000 at a 1.30 factor. Cost: $60,000.
The penalty is $18,818, against $14,478 of interest saved. You came out behind, and you did it by taking the cheaper rate.
The clause that decides how bad it gets
Not all collateral is equal, and the fight is usually over the description on the UCC-1 rather than over the rate.
Ask which of the three you are signing. Ask whether the lender will limit the description to the financed asset. Ask whether it will agree in advance, in writing, to subordinate on a purchase-money equipment filing. That last request costs nothing to make and is occasionally granted.
The questions that settle it
- What do I plan to finance in the next twenty-four months? Write the list down before you sign anything. If the list is empty and you are confident it is empty, pledging is nearly free money.
- Is the collateral description specific or blanket? Get the exact wording that will be filed, before closing.
- What does the lien do to my other options? Receivables, inventory and equipment each have their own funding market and each needs a clean first position to work properly.
- What is the realistic recovery on this asset? If the lender's own appraisal is far below what you think the asset is worth, you are pledging a lot to secure a little, and the rate concession should be large or the pledge should be narrower.
What to ask for, and what to refuse
Ask both lenders to quote the same amount on the same term so the only variable is the security. Ask for the interest difference as a single dollar figure over the term and over the first eighteen months — the second number is the one you compare against your next deal.
Ask for the filing description in the commitment letter, not the closing package. And ask, directly: will you release or limit this filing once the balance drops below a stated level?
Refuse a blanket filing on a facility that funds one identifiable asset. Refuse to treat "we always file all-assets" as a policy rather than a negotiating position. And refuse to pledge personal real estate on a business facility without first asking what rate you get if you do not — sometimes the answer is: the same rate.
Where this applies
Related questions
What does this guide cover?
Collateral does not change whether you can pay. It changes what the lender recovers if you do not — and what you can do with that asset for the next five years.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Working Capital, Term Loan, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Is this specific to construction?
It is written around how a construction business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.