Guide · informational

The Kansas Commercial Financing Disclosure Act, in the order it will matter to you

Approved in April 2024. Six figures before or at closing, a $500,000 ceiling, broker conduct rules, and enforcement vested exclusively in the Attorney General.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Kansas passed its Commercial Financing Disclosure Act as Senate Bill 345 in 2024, approved on 12 April 2024. It follows the Florida and Missouri pattern closely: a short list of dollar figures, a hard ceiling, conduct rules for brokers, and no private right of action.

Who counts as a provider

The Act reaches a person completing five or more commercial financing transactions annually in Kansas. A commercial financing transaction means a commercial loan, an accounts receivable purchase transaction, or a commercial open-end credit plan entered into for business purposes. The definitions borrow heavily from Article 9 vocabulary — account, general intangible, payment intangible — which is how a purchase of future receivables gets pulled inside.

What you receive

Providers must disclose before or at closing:

  1. The total amount of funds provided.
  2. The total amount disbursed, if less than the amount provided.
  3. The total of payments.
  4. The total dollar cost of the financing.
  5. The manner, frequency and amount of each payment, or an estimate where payments vary.
  6. Any costs or discounts associated with prepayment.

Only one disclosure is required for each commercial financing transaction. There is no annual percentage rate on that list and no prescribed form. The statutory text is available in the 2024 Session Laws of Kansas.

"Before or at closing" is the same timing weakness Florida has. The moment you are handed a total cost figure should not be the moment your pen is out. Ask for it in writing when you are still shopping.

Exemptions

The Act does not apply to depository institutions and their regulated subsidiaries; farm credit lenders; transactions secured by real property, leases, or purchase-money obligations; motor vehicle dealer and rental company financing of $50,000 or more; licensed money transmitters; providers completing five or fewer transactions annually; and transactions exceeding $500,000.

Brokers

A broker arranging a Kansas transaction for compensation may not assess an advance fee, though actual service costs such as a credit check are permitted. A broker may not make false or misleading representations, and may not engage, directly or indirectly, in any act that operates or would operate as fraud or deception.

Enforcement

Authority to enforce compliance is vested exclusively with the Attorney General. Penalties are $500 per violation up to $20,000 aggregate for first violations, and $1,000 per violation up to $50,000 for subsequent violations after written notice. The Act creates no private right of action.

Read that last sentence literally. If a provider gets the disclosure wrong, your route is a complaint to the Attorney General, not a claim of your own arising from the Act. Whatever other rights you may have under contract law or other statutes is a separate question and one for a lawyer who has read your agreement.

Making the six figures do more work

The Kansas sheet gives you cost and payment mechanics. It does not give you price. Two steps close the gap.

  • Take the total dollar cost and divide it by the amount actually disbursed. That is your cost per dollar received.
  • Then pin down duration. Where payments vary, item 5 gives you an estimate and a methodology. Ask what sales figure the estimate assumes and compare it to your own bank statements for the last twelve months. If the funder's projection is more optimistic than your reality, the real term is longer and the real annualised cost is lower — but you will be paying for longer than the sheet implies, which is its own problem for cash flow.

Do not accept a factor rate as an answer to the price question. It carries no time dimension at all. Illustrative only — 1.32 on $75,000 is $24,000 of cost; over seven months that is a very different transaction from the same $24,000 over twenty.

The six figures, worked

Illustrative only —a disclosure sheet shows total funds provided $80,000, total disbursed $76,500, total of payments $107,200, total dollar cost $27,200, and payments of $1,340 weekly for 80 weeks.

Start with the number that is not on the sheet. The cost measured against what actually reached your account is $107,200 less $76,500 — $30,700, not the $27,200 disclosed, because the disclosed cost is measured against funds provided rather than funds disbursed. That is $0.40 of cost for every dollar you received.

Then attach the term. Eighty weekly payments is about 18.5 months. Solving for the rate that discounts 80 payments of $1,340 back to the $76,500 you received gives roughly 0.89% a week, an annualised 46%. Write the term and the method beside the figure, because a percentage with no stated basis is how incomparable things end up compared.

Neither number appears on the Kansas sheet, and both come entirely from figures that do.

Test the estimate behind item five

Where payments vary, the Act permits an estimate. An estimate rests on a revenue assumption, and the assumption is the part worth interrogating.

Illustrative only —the same $107,200 total, collected as 7.55% of monthly receipts. On an assumed $190,000 a month, that is $14,345 a month and the deal finishes in 7.5 months. On an actual twelve-month average of $142,000, it is $10,721 a month and the deal runs 10 months.

Ask what revenue figure the estimate used and over what period. If it used your three strongest months, the disclosed duration is the best case and your cash flow planning needs the other one. A longer real term lowers the annualised cost and raises the number of months you carry the payment, and only one of those two is good news.

Two gaps to plan around

The ceiling.Transactions above $500,000 sit outside the Act entirely, so the largest deals arrive with the least paperwork. How a particular structure is treated is a question for a lawyer rather than an assumption you make from the threshold.
The timing."Before or at closing" permits the sheet to arrive with the signature page. Ask for the six figures in writing while you are still comparing offers, which is the only point at which they are any use for choosing.

What Kansas does not do

No rate ceiling. No registration of providers or brokers. No prescribed form, so the disclosure can arrive looking like anything. And the exclusion for transactions over $500,000 means the largest deals get the least paperwork.

Confirm the current text before relying on a threshold quoted here — the 2024 Session Laws show the Act as passed, and later amendments would sit elsewhere.

This is general information and not legal advice for your situation.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

Approved in April 2024. Six figures before or at closing, a $500,000 ceiling, broker conduct rules, and enforcement vested exclusively in the Attorney General.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Business Line of Credit, Invoice Financing, Revenue-Based Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Does this apply in Kansas?

This piece is written about Kansas specifically. Rules on disclosure, broker registration and lender licensing are set at state level and change, so confirm the current position with the state agency named on the Kansas page before relying on it.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading