Guide · informational

How existing positions are counted, and what they do to the next offer

Position is not a ranking of how good your funders are. It is the order of claim on the same cash, and the arithmetic that follows from it decides your next offer.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

What a position is

When a funder advances against your future revenue, it takes a claim on that revenue and usually files a UCC-1 to perfect it. A second funder doing the same thing takes a claim on the same cash, behind the first. That ordering is the position.

Order is established by two different things that people conflate. Legal priority among secured parties generally follows the order of perfection — who filed first. Practical priority follows who gets the money first, which is decided by debit timing and by whether anyone controls the deposit account. A funder in second position by filing date can be first in line every morning if its ACH lands earlier.

The count, and the arithmetic behind it

Underwriters do not stop at how many positions you have. They compute the burden.

The standard calculation converts everything into a daily figure and compares it to daily deposits. Illustrative only — a business with $90,000 of monthly deposits over roughly 21 banking days is taking in about $4,286 a day. Two existing daily debits of $425 and $310 total $735, which is 17.2% of daily deposits. Add a third at $500 and the total is $1,235, or 28.8%.

That percentage is the number that decides the next offer. Some funders publish a ceiling for it; most do not. What every one of them is testing is the same thing: whether enough cash survives the debits to run the business, because a business that cannot buy inventory does not generate the revenue the debits depend on. See daily debit as a share of daily deposits for the full mechanics.

Alongside the percentage they look at:

  • How many positions. Each additional one compounds the problem and shortens the queue in front of you.
  • Balance remaining on each. A position eighty percent repaid is nearly gone; one funded last week is not.
  • Age and payment history. A position that has been debited cleanly for four months is evidence you can carry it.
  • Term structure. Daily debits, weekly debits and monthly amortising payments behave very differently against the same monthly cash flow.
  • Whether the existing contracts prohibit what you are about to do. See MCA anti-stacking clauses.

How they find what you already owe

The application asks. It is not the primary source.

Bank statement debits.The most reliable. A fixed amount leaving every banking day, or every Wednesday, has a shape nothing else produces. Descriptors often identify the funder outright, and where they do not, the rhythm does the work. See what an underwriter reads in three months of bank statements.
A UCC search.Run against the Secretary of State in your state of organisation, and usually through a national aggregator as well.
Commercial credit reports.Patchy, because reporting is voluntary, but public records within them are not.
Shared industry databases.Funders and brokers exchange submission and funding data through clearing-house services.
A bank verification call.Some funders confirm balances and debits directly with the institution.

What an existing UCC-1 filing means, and what it does not

A filed UCC-1 is a public notice that someone claims an interest in described collateral. It is not a judgment, it is not proof of a current balance, and it does not by itself stop a new funding.

Three things routinely go wrong with the index:

Stale filings.A financing statement is effective for five years under UCC §9-515 unless a continuation statement is filed in the last six months of that period. Filings from paid-off deals sit in the index looking live.
Missing terminations.Paying a funder off does not remove its filing. A UCC-3 termination has to be filed by the secured party. Ask for it in writing at payoff, and check the index a month later that it happened.
Over-broad collateral descriptions.A blanket lien on "all assets now owned or hereafter acquired" from a small advance can obstruct a much larger later transaction.

When a new lender needs priority that an existing filing blocks, the tools are a payoff, a subordination agreement, or an intercreditor agreement between the two secured parties. All three are negotiations, and none of them happen quickly. See collateral, blanket liens and UCC-1 filings and what is a UCC filing on my receivables.

Coverage, in plain terms

Bank and term lenders express the same concern with a ratio rather than a percentage of daily deposits. Debt service coverage is cash available to service debt, divided by the debt service due in the same period.

Illustrative only — a business with $180,000 of annual cash flow available for debt service and $150,000 of annual principal and interest has coverage of 1.20. It generates $1.20 for every dollar of scheduled payment. Below 1.0 the business is not covering its payments out of operations. Lenders want a cushion above 1.0, and the size of the cushion they want is theirs and varies by lender, by product and by industry; nobody should quote you a market standard as if it were a rule.

Two things trip people up. First, an existing advance with a daily debit is debt service even where the contract calls it a purchase of receivables — the cash leaves either way, and a careful analyst includes it. Second, the new facility's payments go in the denominator too; coverage is computed after the loan you are asking for, not before it. The full method is in debt service coverage ratio and how lenders calculate it and worked through in debt service coverage step by step.

What to do before you apply

  1. Run your own UCC search and read every filing on the index against you.
  2. Pursue terminations for anything paid off, in writing.
  3. Build a one-page debt schedule: funder, original amount, current balance, payment, frequency, remaining term.
  4. Compute your own daily obligation as a share of daily deposits.
  5. Disclose all of it up front.

The last point is the one that pays. An underwriter who is handed the debt schedule prices the debt. An underwriter who finds a position you did not mention prices the omission as well.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

Position is not a ranking of how good your funders are. It is the order of claim on the same cash, and the arithmetic that follows from it decides your next offer.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, Revenue-Based Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading