Soft costs: the part of an equipment deal that funders argue about
Freight, rigging, installation, training and sales tax can add a quarter to the project. Not every lender will finance any of it.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
The machine costs $100,000. The project costs $125,700. The gap is soft costs, and whether a funder will advance against them decides how much cash leaves your account on day one.
What counts as a soft cost
Anything in the total project that is not the hard asset a funder could repossess and sell:
Why funders resist
A funder underwrites two things: your ability to pay and the value of the collateral if you do not. Soft costs have no liquidation value. Freight paid last March cannot be repossessed. Training already delivered cannot be resold. Every soft-cost dollar financed is an unsecured dollar inside a secured deal, which raises the funder's loss if the deal goes wrong.
That is the whole argument. It also explains the shape of the answers you will get.
How the market actually handles it
Three patterns exist, and which one you get depends on the funder and on your credit.
- Hard cost only. The funder advances against the invoice for the equipment and nothing else. You pay freight, rigging, training and tax from working capital.
- Soft costs capped as a percentage of equipment cost. Common. The cap is a policy number that varies by funder, and it is worth asking for as a number rather than a reassurance.
- Full project cost. Some funders will finance the whole turnkey number, usually for stronger credits, sometimes at a different rate, and sometimes only where the soft costs are itemised on the vendor's invoice.
Illustrative only — a $100,000 machine with $6,500 freight, $9,000 rigging and installation, $3,200 training and $7,000 sales tax is a $125,700 project. Under a hard-cost-only approval you fund $25,700 in cash. Under a cap set at 20% of equipment cost, $20,000 of the soft costs are financed and $5,700 comes out of your account. Same machine, same funder appetite, a $20,000 difference in what the deal does to your bank balance.
Get the soft costs onto the vendor invoice
The single most useful thing you can do is ask the vendor to itemise everything on one invoice rather than sending separate bills from a rigger, a trainer and a freight company. Funders are far more comfortable advancing against line items on the equipment invoice than against three third-party invoices they have to chase and verify.
It is not a formality. A funder that says it does not finance installation will often finance an invoice that reads machine, delivered and commissioned. Nothing is being disguised — the work is real and the itemisation is honest — it is about the funder being able to document one transaction with one vendor.
Sales tax deserves its own paragraph
Tax treatment varies by state and by structure, and it is a place where people get an unpleasant surprise. In some states a lease is taxed on each payment as it is made, in others the tax is due up front on the full equipment price, and some equipment qualifies for a manufacturing or agricultural exemption that applies to a purchase but has to be claimed differently on a lease. Ask three questions: is tax charged up front or per payment, who remits it, and does the exemption I normally claim survive this structure? Your state's department of revenue is the authority; the funder's answer is a starting point, not a ruling.
What financing the soft costs actually costs
Set that against the alternative of paying $20,000 from working capital in the month the machine arrives. The question is not whether $4,910 is a lot. It is whether $20,000 of cash in the month of installation is worth more than $4,910 spread over five years. For a business about to increase output, and therefore about to fund raw material, wages and a receivables cycle before the machine earns anything, it usually is.
The answer flips when the soft costs are financed over a term longer than the benefit lasts. Training delivered once and financed over seven years is a payment you are still making long after the trained people have moved on.
Long lead times and progress payments
Where a machine is built to order, the vendor often wants a deposit at order and a further payment before shipment, months before anything is installed. Funders handle that in one of three ways, and which one applies changes your cash position materially.
Ask which of the three applies, and ask what happens if the delivery date slips past the approval's expiry. That is the question that decides whether a six-week delay costs you anything.
What to ask before you accept the approval
- Which of these line items are you financing, and which am I paying?
- Is there a soft-cost cap, and what is it as a dollar figure on this deal?
- Do you need the soft costs itemised on the equipment invoice, or will you take separate vendor invoices?
- Is sales tax inside the financed amount or due from me at funding?
- If the installation runs over budget, can the amount be increased before funding, and how late?
That last question saves deals. Rigging quotes move. If your funder can amend the amount up to the funding date, an overrun is a phone call. If it cannot, an overrun is cash you did not plan to spend, in the same week you are trying to get a machine running.
Where this applies
Related questions
What does this guide cover?
Freight, rigging, installation, training and sales tax can add a quarter to the project. Not every lender will finance any of it.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Working Capital, Equipment Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Is this specific to construction?
It is written around how a construction business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.