Guide · commercial

A second position advance or a sale-leaseback on equipment you own

One sells a slice of next quarter's sales. The other sells a machine you already paid for, and hands you a tax bill in the same year.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Both raise cash without a bank. One sells future receipts; the other sells an asset you already own and rents it back. The structural difference that drives everything: the advance is repaid out of revenue and the worst case is a cash-flow crisis, while the leaseback is repaid out of a fixed payment and the worst case is repossession of the machine that generates the revenue.

There is a second difference that appears on a tax return rather than a term sheet. Selling depreciated equipment triggers recapture of the depreciation you already deducted, as ordinary income, in the year of sale. Nobody mentions this at the quote stage, and it can be the largest single number in the transaction.

Where the sale-leaseback wins

Illustrative only —you need $120,000. You own equipment that cost $180,000, is carried at $40,000 of book value, and appraises at $130,000 on a forced-liquidation basis.
  • Leaseback: the funder advances 70% of the appraised figure — $91,000 — and leases the equipment back over 36 months at 12%. Payment $3,022.50, total paid $108,810, cost $17,810.
  • Second-position advance: $120,000 at a 1.34 factor. Repay $160,800, cost $40,800, remitted at 14% of collections. On $95,000 of monthly sales that is $13,300 a month for about twelve months.

The leaseback costs less than half as much and takes $3,022 a month instead of $13,300. On raw cost and on monthly burden it is not close. If the equipment is a spare line, an older unit, a truck you could replace within a week, or anything whose loss would not stop production, take the leaseback.

Where the advance wins

Illustrative only —same numbers, but the equipment is the production line. Two things change.
The tax.Sold at $130,000 against a book value of $40,000, $90,000 is recaptured as ordinary income. At an illustrative 32% combined marginal rate, that is a $28,800 tax bill in the year of the transaction. Net cash from the leaseback is therefore $62,200, not $91,000 — against the advance's $120,000.
The remedy.Miss payments on the leaseback and the funder takes the machine, under a clause that typically obliges you to keep paying regardless of whether the equipment works. Miss remittances on an advance and you are in a fight about money. One of those fights you can survive.

So the honest comparison is $62,200 of usable cash with the production line pledged, against $120,000 with a claim on receipts. The advance costs $23,000 more and does not put the business's operating capacity on the table.

The variable that flips it: whether the machine is replaceable.If losing it stops revenue, the cheaper financing is secured by the only thing keeping you solvent, and its price is not the number on the quote.

Two clauses to read before anything else

The hell-or-high-water clause.Standard in equipment leases. It obliges you to pay for the full term regardless of whether the equipment functions, is destroyed, or becomes useless to you. In a leaseback you are accepting that on a machine you used to own outright.
The anti-stacking clause.If you already have an advance, its anti-stacking clause may make a second position an event of default on the first — turning a funding decision into an acceleration. Read the existing agreement before you take a second position, not after.

The prices are not on the same measure

The leaseback is quoted as a monthly payment over a stated term, with an end-of-term option that may or may not be included in the figure. The advance is quoted as a factor with no time dimension at all.

Put them on one page with four figures each: net cash received after tax, total dollars repaid, dollars per month, and the number of months. Then add a fifth line that has no number — what the funder can take if you stop paying. On this comparison that line is the decision.

The questions that settle it

  1. What is the book value of the equipment and what will it sell for? The gap is your recapture exposure. Ask your accountant for the figure before you sign, not in March.
  2. If this machine disappeared on Monday, what happens? If the answer is "we stop", do not pledge it for working capital.
  3. What does my existing funding agreement say about additional financing and additional liens? Both structures can breach it.
  4. What is the end-of-term position on the leaseback? A dollar buyout, a percentage put, or fair market value — these produce very different total costs and the monthly payment hides the difference.

What to ask for, and what to refuse

Ask the leaseback funder for the appraisal it is using and the basis — orderly liquidation or forced liquidation. Ask for the advance percentage against that figure and the end-of-term option in writing.

Ask your accountant for the recapture number in dollars before you commit. Ask the advance funder for the total repayment amount, the specified percentage and the reconciliation clause reference.

Have the equipment schedule ready: make, model, serial, year, original cost, accumulated depreciation, and any existing lien. Run a UCC search on your own entity first — a stale filing from a paid-off deal will stop a leaseback cold, and it takes weeks to clear.

Refuse a leaseback on equipment you cannot operate without, unless you have priced the alternative and the alternative is worse. Refuse to sign before the tax consequence is quantified. And refuse a second position without reading the first agreement's default clause in full.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

One sells a slice of next quarter's sales. The other sells a machine you already paid for, and hands you a tax bill in the same year.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Equipment Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to construction?

It is written around how a construction business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading