Find Me Funders
Why the cheapest-looking quote often has the most fees outside it
Because the headline number is the one being shopped, and everything moved out of it is not.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
Why is the cheapest-looking funding quote often the most expensive?
The headline rate is what buyers compare, so it is the number under competitive pressure — and the cost has to reappear somewhere else. Illustrative only — a 1.25 factor with five points and a $795 administrative fee delivers $46,705 of cash on a $50,000 advance and costs $15,795, while a flat 1.30 with no fees delivers $50,000 and costs $15,000. The lower headline is $795 more expensive, and the only way to see it is to compute cost against cash received.
The mechanism
Buyers compare headline numbers, so headline numbers get competed down. The cost does not disappear; it moves to line items nobody is shopping — points deducted at funding, administrative charges, ACH program fees, a monthly servicing charge, a fee for the payoff letter.
A quote is only as good as the list of things it excludes.
Worked
Illustrative only — $50,000, two offers, both repaid over roughly six months of daily debits.
Y has the higher headline and is $795 cheaper. That is not a coincidence: five points on $50,000 is $2,500, which is exactly the five-hundredths of factor separating 1.25 from 1.30. The points cancel the factor advantage precisely, and the $795 administrative fee is the entire difference between the two deals.
Annualised over 125 daily debits — $500 a day for X, $520 for Y — X is 123.0% and Y is 110.1%.
The tells
The fees, by name
Ask for them in dollars, by this list, in one message. A quote is complete when every line has either a figure or a nil against it.
The last group is the one nobody prices, because nobody expects to reach it.
The fees that arrive after funding
The worked comparison above only counts money taken at funding. Now add the term.
Illustrative only — a 99 monthly servicing fee over six months is 594; 5 per debit across 125 debits is 625; two returned payments at 35 is 70. Total 1,289.
Applied to Offer Y, the total paid becomes 66,289 against 50,000 of cash, so the effective factor rises from 1.3000 to 1.3258. Applied to Offer X instead, X moves from 1.3382 to 1.3658.
If only one of them charges these and you compared on funding-day numbers alone, you have mis-ranked by 2,084 on a 50,000 deal. Per-debit charges do most of that damage, because a daily product has a hundred or more payment events and nobody multiplies a small number by 125 in their head.
Getting the list
One sentence, in writing: please confirm the complete list of all amounts payable by us at funding, during the term, and on payoff or default, stated in dollars.
What a good answer looks like: a written list, a settlement or funding statement showing the exact amount to be wired, and a willingness to send both before signature. What a bad answer looks like: a range, a reference to the agreement, or a promise that the fees are standard.
If a fee appears at signing that was not in that answer, that is not a negotiation point. It is a demonstration of how the rest of the relationship will run, and the right response is to ask for the offer to be reissued in writing with the fee removed or the total adjusted, and to be genuinely willing to walk.
Where the cost hides inside the structure
Not every fee is called a fee. Three places it turns up as part of the deal's shape:
The defence
One calculation, every time: cost = total of all payments − cash actually received. Divide by cash received to get cost per dollar. Rank on that.
It is immune to pricing conventions, immune to which fees are inside and which are outside, and it takes about a minute per offer once you have the fee list in dollars. Getting that list is the actual work — see the fee list to demand before you sign. The calculators will do the ranking once you have the inputs.
Where this applies
Related questions
Why is the cheapest-looking funding quote often the most expensive?
The headline rate is what buyers compare, so it is the number under competitive pressure — and the cost has to reappear somewhere else. Illustrative only — a 1.25 factor with five points and a $795 administrative fee delivers $46,705 of cash on a $50,000 advance and costs $15,795, while a flat 1.30 with no fees delivers $50,000 and costs $15,000. The lower headline is $795 more expensive, and the only way to see it is to compute cost against cash received.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Revenue-Based Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Are the figures here quotes?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.