Find Me Funders
What do ACH and NSF fees add to the cost of financing?
They are a cost of the collection method rather than of the money, and the number of payment events decides how big they get.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
What do ACH and NSF fees cost on a daily debit schedule?
Per-debit administrative charges and returned-payment fees are priced per payment event, so a daily schedule exposes you to them far more than a weekly one. Illustrative only — on a $50,000 advance repaid in 130 debits, $5 per debit plus four $39 NSF charges adds $806, which raises the annualised cost from 105.9% to 111.2%. The same fee structure on a weekly schedule would cost $130 in administrative charges instead of $650.
They scale with payment events, not with money
Interest and factor cost scale with the amount and the term. ACH and NSF charges scale with how many times money moves. That makes them a cost of the collection mechanism, and it is why a daily schedule and a monthly schedule with the same dollars are not the same deal.
Worked
Illustrative only — $50,000 at a 1.30 factor, repaying $65,000 in 130 daily debits of $500. Solving for the daily rate and multiplying by 252 banking days gives an annualised 105.9%.
Now add the collection costs: a $5 administrative charge on each debit, and four returned debits at $39 each.
- Administrative: $5 x 130 = $650.
- Returned payments: $39 x 4 = $156.
- Total: $806, which is $6.20 per debit.
Payments become $506.20, and the annualised cost rises to 111.2% — an increase of 5.2 percentage points. In dollars, $806 is 1.61% of the amount advanced and 5.4% of the $15,000 the money was supposed to cost.
On a weekly schedule with the same total, the same $5 charge applies 26 times instead of 130, so the administrative element falls from $650 to $130.
The part that compounds
A returned debit rarely arrives alone. The typical sequence is: the debit fails, the funder charges an NSF fee, your own bank charges its own returned-item fee, the funder re-presents the debit — sometimes the same day, sometimes doubled to catch up — and the doubled debit fails too.
Ask three questions before signing:
- What is the fee for a returned debit, on the funder's side?
- How many failures constitute an event of default?
- On a failure, is the next debit doubled, or is the schedule simply extended?
The third one is the difference between a bad week and a default.
What one bad week costs
- Monday: the $500 debit fails. The funder charges $39, your bank charges a $35 returned-item fee, and the $5 administrative charge still applies.
- Tuesday: the funder re-presents at $1,000 to catch up. It fails too. Another $39, another $35, another $5.
- Wednesday and Thursday clear.
- Friday: a $1,500 catch-up debit fails. $39, $35 and $5 again.
Three failures: $117 to the funder, $105 to your bank, $25 of administrative charges. $247 in a single week, against a scheduled weekly remittance of $2,500. Roughly a tenth of the week's payment, spent entirely on the fact that the payment did not land.
Nothing about the money changed. Only the plumbing failed.
Where these charges live in the contract
Rarely in the paragraph that states the price. Look for:
What your own bank charges, separately
The funder's fee is one side of it. Your bank has its own schedule and its own behaviour, and the two interact:
- A returned-item fee per presentment, so a re-presented debit can generate the fee twice.
- An overdraft fee where the bank pays the item instead of returning it, which may be larger.
- An extended overdraft charge for each day the account stays negative.
- A daily or monthly cap on such items, which matters enormously on a daily schedule.
Ask your business banker for the current schedule and the cap, in writing. If the account is about to take 130 debits, that document is part of your cost of borrowing, and most owners have never read it.
What to do about it
- Get the per-debit and per-failure charges in dollars, in writing, before signing.
- Ask whether a weekly schedule is available at the same total. If it is, it is cheaper to run.
- Keep a buffer sized to at least a week of debits in the account the debits hit.
- Count the payment events. Multiply by the per-event charge. Add it to the total before you compare offers — see the fee list to demand before you sign.
None of this is in the factor rate, and all of it is in your bank statement. The calculators will let you add per-payment charges to the schedule and see what they do to the annualised figure.
How to tell before you sign
Ask for three dollar figures and a count: the per-debit administrative charge, the funder's returned-payment fee, the number of payment events across the deal, and how many failures constitute an event of default. Four short answers, refusable only by someone who would rather you did not have them.
If the per-debit charge is quoted as zero, confirm it in the document rather than in an email. A charge that lives in a schedule you were never sent is the most common version of this problem.
Where this applies
Related questions
What do ACH and NSF fees cost on a daily debit schedule?
Per-debit administrative charges and returned-payment fees are priced per payment event, so a daily schedule exposes you to them far more than a weekly one. Illustrative only — on a $50,000 advance repaid in 130 debits, $5 per debit plus four $39 NSF charges adds $806, which raises the annualised cost from 105.9% to 111.2%. The same fee structure on a weekly schedule would cost $130 in administrative charges instead of $650.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Revenue-Based Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Are the figures here quotes?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.