Question and answer · informational

What are ineligibles in a borrowing base?

The collateral you own, that the lender will not count, because collecting it depends on something other than your customer paying.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

What are ineligibles in a borrowing base?

Ineligibles are the parts of your receivables or inventory that the lender excludes from the borrowing base before applying an advance rate. They are excluded because collection is doubtful, contested, offset by something you owe, or legally awkward to enforce — not because the asset is worthless. Every exclusion is defined in your credit agreement, most are negotiable at closing, and several can be fixed by changing how you bill and collect.

Ineligibility is not a judgement about your business. It is a judgement about how easily the lender could collect that particular asset if it had to.

Common receivable exclusions

Aged invoices.Anything past a stated number of days from invoice date or due date. The cut-off is defined in the agreement.
Cross-aged accounts.If a set percentage of a customer's balance is past the cut-off, the whole balance for that customer becomes ineligible, on the theory that a customer in trouble on part of its balance is in trouble on all of it.
Concentration.The portion of one customer's balance above a stated share of total receivables. The invoices are good; the risk of one payer is not.
Affiliates and related parties.Money owed by companies under common ownership.
Contras.Customers who are also your suppliers, because they can offset what they owe you against what you owe them.
Foreign accounts.Debtors outside the country, unless credit-insured or supported by a letter of credit, because enforcement is harder.
Government accounts.Federal receivables need an assignment under the Assignment of Claims Act before a lender can take them seriously. See assignment of claims.
Disputed, contingent or unbilled amounts.Progress billings not yet earned, retainage, bill-and-hold arrangements, invoices subject to a claim, and anything you have not actually invoiced.

Common inventory exclusions

Work in progress, consigned goods, slow-moving or obsolete stock, packaging and supplies, goods in transit without documents, inventory held at a location without a landlord or warehouseman waiver, and anything subject to a purchase money security interest.

Why it lands harder than expected

Ineligibles come off before the advance rate, so their effect is not reduced by it. Illustrative only: 100,000 of newly ineligible invoices at an 80% advance rate removes 80,000 of availability, not 20,000. A single customer crossing a concentration limit can therefore cost more availability than a bad sales month.

The cross-age cascade, worked

Illustrative only — receivables of $1,400,000, of which one customer owes $310,000. Of that balance, $96,000 has crossed the ageing cut-off, which is 31% of what they owe you.

Your agreement sets the cross-ageing threshold at 25%. Above it, the entire balance for that customer becomes ineligible, not merely the late part.

At an 85% advance rate, the availability removed is $310,000 at 85%, or $263,500, caused by $96,000 of late invoices. A ratio of 2.74 to 1.

The same $96,000 collected four days earlier costs you nothing whatsoever. That is the argument for treating the ageing cut-off as a hard operational deadline rather than an accounting convention, and for knowing at any given week which of your customers is closest to the threshold.

What you can actually do

  • Bill the day the work is delivered. Unbilled work is worth nothing in a base.
  • Collect before the aging cut-off rather than after it, and treat the cut-off date as a real deadline.
  • Clear credit notes and disputes promptly instead of letting them age on the ledger.
  • Get landlord and warehouse waivers signed early, because that exclusion is administrative rather than credit-driven.
  • Negotiate at closing. Cut-off days, cross-aging percentages, concentration limits and a named-customer carve-out for a large, creditworthy account are all deal points, and they are much easier to change before signing than after.

How to check the lender's exclusions against your own ledger

The ineligibles report is produced by a person applying a definition to your ageing. It is frequently wrong at the margin, and the errors are recoverable if you find them inside the month.

Read the reason codes, not the total.A total that holds steady while its composition churns is a different situation from a total that holds steady because nothing moved, and only the codes tell you which one you are in.
Look for the same invoice excluded twice.An invoice that is both past the cut-off and above the concentration limit should come out once. Systems that apply the rules in sequence sometimes take it out under both, and the difference is availability you are entitled to.
Send the cash received after the ageing date.Payments that arrive between your ageing date and the lender's processing date make paid invoices look unpaid. Attach the subsequent cash receipts to the certificate rather than waiting to be asked about them.

Raise any discrepancy the same week, in writing, with invoice numbers attached. Raised late it reads as an argument about a number. Raised immediately it reads as a control environment, which is the thing the lender is actually forming a view about.

Beyond the obvious deal points

Cut-off days, cross-ageing percentages and concentration limits are where most negotiations stop. Four more that are rarely asked for and are often given:

Ageing measured from due date rather than invoice date.If you sell on 60-day terms against a 90-day cut-off measured from invoice, you have 30 days of grace. Measured from due date you have 90. On long-dated terms this is the largest single change available to you.
Eligibility for government receivables once the assignment is properly in place,rather than a blanket exclusion that survives the paperwork being completed.
Notice and a stated basis before a new reserve or exclusion category appears.Not a veto, which no lender will give, but a requirement to say why in writing before the certificate changes.
A substitution rightthe ability to replace an invoice that has become ineligible with an eligible one, instead of repaying immediately when the base moves against you mid-month.

Ask for all four. It costs nothing, and how a lender answers tells you how it intends to behave on the month the base tightens.

Ineligible is not the same as uncollectable

Worth saying plainly, because it changes how you respond. An invoice excluded from the base is still money owed to you, still collectable, and still yours. The lender has decided it will not advance against it, which is a judgement about its own recovery position in a bad scenario rather than a forecast about your customer.

That distinction matters in two places. When a large account goes ineligible on concentration grounds, the correct response is to keep collecting it normally — not to chase that customer harder than the rest, which is how good accounts get annoyed over a covenant they have never heard of. And when you forecast cash, forecast from the receivable rather than from the borrowing base. The two diverge most sharply at exactly the moment you are depending on the forecast.

Ask for the ineligibles report every month in the same format, and read the reason codes rather than the total. A total that holds steady while its composition churns is a different situation from a total that holds steady because nothing is moving, and only the codes tell you which one you are in.

Where this applies

Related questions

What are ineligibles in a borrowing base?

Ineligibles are the parts of your receivables or inventory that the lender excludes from the borrowing base before applying an advance rate. They are excluded because collection is doubtful, contested, offset by something you owe, or legally awkward to enforce — not because the asset is worthless. Every exclusion is defined in your credit agreement, most are negotiable at closing, and several can be fixed by changing how you bill and collect.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Business Line of Credit, Invoice Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading