Question and answer · informational

How does a lender treat an earnout in an acquisition?

As debt service in the year it is payable, unless you structure it so the profit that triggers it also pays it.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

How does a lender treat an earnout when I am financing an acquisition?

Most lenders will not finance contingent consideration and will treat an earnout as an obligation that must be subordinated, unsecured, and payable only when post-closing coverage tests are met. The problem is arithmetic: in an illustrative deal with 210,000 of cash flow and 123,129 of annual debt service, coverage of 1.71 falls to 0.85 in the year a 125,000 earnout falls due. The fix is to define the earnout as a share of the incremental profit it measures, paid in arrears from cash actually generated, with a cap and a subordination agreement the senior lender has approved before closing.

An earnout solves a disagreement about the future. The buyer thinks the business will do one thing, the seller thinks it will do better, and the gap gets bridged by a payment contingent on what actually happens. That is a sensible instrument. It becomes a problem when the contingent payment lands in a year where the business is also servicing acquisition debt.

What the lender does with it

They generally will not finance it.A lender advances against a purchase price that is fixed at closing. Contingent consideration is not something they can size a loan against, and under a guaranteed programme the rules about what may be financed are narrower still. Confirm your lender's position in writing early; discovering at credit committee that the structure is unacceptable costs weeks.
They will require it to be subordinated.A subordination and standby agreement, signed by the seller, preventing payment when it would breach coverage or when a default exists.
They will count it as debt service in the year it is payable.This is the part that surprises buyers, who think of an earnout as "only payable if we do well".

The arithmetic that decides it

Illustrative only —a base price of 900,000, buyer equity of 90,000, and 810,000 financed over ten years at 9 per cent. Annual debt service is 123,129. Cash available for debt service is 210,000.
  • Coverage without the earnout: 1.71. Comfortable.
  • A fixed earnout of 125,000 falling due in year two: coverage becomes 210,000 divided by 248,129 — 0.85.

The business cannot pay both. So it pays the bank and asks the seller to wait, which is exactly what the subordination agreement contemplates, and the deal that felt collaborative at signing becomes a dispute at the first measurement date.

The structure that works

Define the earnout as a share of the increment it measures, payable from cash actually collected, in arrears.

Same deal, restructured: the earnout is 35 per cent of gross profit above a 1,000,000 baseline, capped at 250,000 in total, payable annually in arrears within 90 days of audited or reviewed figures.

If incremental gross profit in year two is 360,000, the earnout payment is 126,000 — almost identical to the fixed version. But the cash flow is different, because the increment that triggered the payment also generated cash. If 55 per cent of that incremental gross profit flows through to cash after the costs of producing it, available cash flow rises to 408,000. After paying the 126,000 earnout, coverage against the senior debt is 2.29, with a cushion of about 159,000.

The earnout is now self-funding. The seller gets paid more when the business does better, the lender is not squeezed, and the buyer is not writing a cheque out of a year that did not produce the money.

Getting the metric right

The metric determines whether the structure works. Rank them:

  • Cash collected — best for the buyer's cash flow, because payment follows money in the door. Sellers dislike it because collection is in the buyer's hands.
  • Gross profit — good middle ground. Harder to manipulate than net profit, directly related to cash generation, and both parties can verify it.
  • Revenue — simple and verifiable, but a revenue earnout can be earned on unprofitable sales. If you use it, pair it with a minimum margin condition.
  • Net profit or EBITDA — worst for disputes. Every allocation, owner salary, management fee and capital decision becomes an argument, because the buyer now controls the accounting.

Define the measurement in the agreement, line by line: which accounts, which accounting basis, who prepares the statements, what happens to costs the buyer introduces, how a dispute is resolved and by whom.

Clauses that prevent the predictable fights

  • A cap, stated in dollars, and a floor below which nothing is payable.
  • Payment conditioned on senior debt coverage at a stated level after the payment, with deferral rather than forfeiture if the test fails, and interest on deferred amounts.
  • Acceleration on sale. If the buyer sells the business during the earnout period, what happens? Silence here produces litigation.
  • Protection against the buyer starving the metric — no relocating revenue to an affiliate, no unusual charges to the measured unit, a commitment to operate in the ordinary course.
  • Protection for the buyer from the seller's departure — if the earnout depends on the seller's relationships, the seller's continued involvement should be an obligation, not a hope.
  • Set-off against the earnout for breaches of representations and warranties. The earnout is the most useful security a buyer has and most agreements fail to make it available.

One practical note on timing: measurement periods that end on the acquisition anniversary rather than the fiscal year end create extra accounting work and extra room for argument. Align the earnout period with your accounting year wherever the seller will accept it, so the figures come out of the same close process that produces everything else.

What to do before you agree an earnout

  1. Ask your lender, in writing, whether they will permit an earnout at all and on what terms. Do this before the letter of intent is signed.
  2. Model coverage in every year of the earnout period, including the payment. If any year falls below the lender's requirement, the structure is wrong.
  3. Convert a fixed earnout into a share-of-increment earnout, and show the seller the arithmetic — they usually end up with more.
  4. Get the subordination agreement drafted early, and have the seller's counsel review it before closing week.
  5. Write the measurement definition with your accountant, not your lawyer alone.
  6. Agree the dispute mechanism and the accounting standard in the same clause as the metric.

Where this applies

Related questions

How does a lender treat an earnout when I am financing an acquisition?

Most lenders will not finance contingent consideration and will treat an earnout as an obligation that must be subordinated, unsecured, and payable only when post-closing coverage tests are met. The problem is arithmetic: in an illustrative deal with 210,000 of cash flow and 123,129 of annual debt service, coverage of 1.71 falls to 0.85 in the year a 125,000 earnout falls due. The fix is to define the earnout as a share of the incremental profit it measures, paid in arrears from cash actually generated, with a cap and a subordination agreement the senior lender has approved before closing.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Term Loan, SBA Loan. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to healthcare?

It is written around how a healthcare business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading