Question and answer · informational

What client concentration does to a staffing facility

The client that got you to scale is the one that caps your availability, and the rule that does the damage is not the one most owners read.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

What does client concentration do to a staffing agency's funding facility?

Most receivables facilities cap how much of the eligible base a single client can represent, and everything above that cap is ineligible — so a client growing from 20 percent to 45 percent of your ledger can cut your availability while sales rise. The more dangerous rule is cross-aging: if a set proportion of one client's invoices pass a defined age, that client's whole balance can become ineligible at once. Know both numbers before you sign, ask in writing for a higher limit on your strongest clients, and measure concentration in gross profit rather than revenue.

Winning a big account is how a staffing agency grows, and how it finds out the funding facility has a governor on it.

The concentration limit

Almost every receivables facility caps single-debtor exposure. Above the cap the excess is ineligible: still your receivable, just no longer generating availability.

That catches people out. Grow the big account and total receivables rise while your borrowing base can fall, because more of the ledger sits above the cap: busier, more payroll to fund, less availability. Concentration is measured against the eligible base, so it moves when other clients pay — a quiet month elsewhere pushes your big client over the line without them doing anything.

The arithmetic, because it is not intuitive

Illustrative only —a 20% single-debtor cap applied against the eligible base, and an 85% advance rate.

Start with an $800,000 ledger: your largest client owes $160,000 and everyone else owes $640,000. The cap admits that client up to 20% of the eligible base, which works out at $160,000 against the other $640,000 — so the whole balance is eligible. Eligible base $800,000, availability $680,000.

Now win more work from the same client and take their balance to $360,000, with the rest of the ledger unchanged. Total receivables are $1,000,000. The cap still admits only $160,000 of that client, so the eligible base is still $800,000 and availability is still $680,000. You added $200,000 of receivables, hired against them, and generated no additional availability at all. The extra payroll comes out of your own cash.

Then that client slows down and cross-aging applies: enough of their invoices pass the age threshold, and all $360,000 goes ineligible, current invoices included. The eligible base drops to $640,000 and availability to $544,000 — a fall of $136,000 in the week you owe payroll on the people placed there.

Cross-aging, which does more damage

Find this clause before you sign. Cross-aging, sometimes called taint or contamination, says that if some proportion of a client's invoices pass a defined age, all of that client's invoices become ineligible, including current ones.

Combine it with concentration and one slow-paying large client can remove much of your borrowing base overnight, in the same week you have to make payroll for the workers placed there. The invoices are good. They are late, and the rule does not distinguish.

Ask three things: the aging threshold, the proportion that triggers it, and whether it is applied per client or across the ledger.

Measure concentration in gross profit, not revenue

A client at 30 percent of revenue but 15 percent of gross profit is a different exposure from one at 30 percent of both, because gross profit is what you lose if they go. Run both numbers and present both; an underwriter who sees you understand the distinction takes the rest of your reporting more seriously.

What else concentration affects

Pricing and advance rate.A concentrated ledger may be priced accordingly or advanced lower.
Whether you get non-recourse at all.Credit protection on one dominant debtor is a different question, and the funder's own limit on that debtor may bind first.
MSP and VMS arrangements.Where a managed service provider or vendor management system sits between you and the end client, the debtor of record may be the intermediary rather than the company where your workers are. That concentrates apparently separate placements into one debtor and can extend terms. Check who the funder treats as the account debtor.
Your own risk, separately from the facility.A client at 40 percent of gross profit can end the agency by leaving.

What can be negotiated

More than owners assume:

  • A higher limit for named strong-credit clients, granted in writing at the outset rather than requested during a squeeze
  • Cross-aging applied per client rather than across the ledger
  • A carve-out or higher threshold for clients with documented long payment terms
  • Advance notice before a limit is reduced
  • A defined process for raising a limit as a client's history lengthens

Ask at term sheet stage. Once documented, they are hard to reopen.

How to see it coming

None of this arrives without warning, and the warning sits in reports you already produce:

  • Your largest client's days sales outstanding drifting. Tracked weekly, two weeks of drift is the earliest signal you will get that cross-aging is in range.
  • A quiet month elsewhere. Because concentration is measured against the eligible base, a slow month from your other clients raises your big client's share without them doing anything at all. Watch the ratio, not the balance.
  • A large placement starting. Payroll begins immediately and the first invoice is a week or two behind it. Model the availability effect before you accept the order, not after the first Friday.
  • Credit memos and rebates. Dilution reduces the eligible base too, and a volume rebate agreed with your biggest client lands in the same calculation.

Run a borrowing base yourself, weekly, on your own spreadsheet, using the facility's actual rules. If your number and the funder's disagree, you want to find that out on a Tuesday rather than on a payroll Thursday.

What to have ready

  • Aged receivables by client, with days sales outstanding per client
  • Concentration by revenue and by gross profit, both
  • Twelve months of payment history by client
  • Contracts showing agreed terms, including any MSP or VMS arrangement
  • Credit information on your largest clients
  • Your pipeline, showing how concentration should change

What to ask, and what to refuse

Ask for the concentration limit, the cross-aging threshold and trigger, and how the eligible base is calculated, in writing, before paying any diligence fee. Ask what notice you get before a limit changes.

Refuse a facility whose cross-aging rule you have not read. Refuse to build a growth plan around one client without a written limit that accommodates it. And refuse a large account on extended terms before confirming your funder treats it as eligible — an ineligible receivable is a payroll you fund yourself.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does client concentration do to a staffing agency's funding facility?

Most receivables facilities cap how much of the eligible base a single client can represent, and everything above that cap is ineligible — so a client growing from 20 percent to 45 percent of your ledger can cut your availability while sales rise. The more dangerous rule is cross-aging: if a set proportion of one client's invoices pass a defined age, that client's whole balance can become ineligible at once. Know both numbers before you sign, ask in writing for a higher limit on your strongest clients, and measure concentration in gross profit rather than revenue.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Working Capital, Invoice Financing, Payroll Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to staffing?

It is written around how a staffing business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading